illustration of diplomacy: two people shaking hands
  • China maintains embassies in all 53 African countries with which it has diplomatic relations, against 50 EU Delegations and 49 US embassies. Six countries — Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal and Tunisia — host all 15 external actors tracked.
  • High-level visits are concentrated in North Africa, led by the EU (75 visits across 25 countries), followed by Türkiye and China, which has the widest and most geographically balanced coverage of any actor.
  • China stands out for the breadth of its formal partnerships, while the EU, US and UAE formalise more selectively. Summit diplomacy is increasingly crowded, with established EU, Chinese and Japanese frameworks alongside newer, more intermittent initiatives from Russia, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and South Korea.
  • At the UN, abstention remains the predominant African position, though African states align more closely with the EU than Russia on Ukraine, and with China, India and Türkiye on decolonisation.

Diplomatic engagement is one of the clearest signals of how external actors position themselves across Africa. The density of embassy networks, the pace of high-level visits, and the language used to describe bilateral ties all point to where relationships are deepening and where they remain more distant.

This chapter traces these patterns across four dimensions: the scale of diplomatic representation, the frequency and geographic focus of high-level visits, the hierarchy of formal partnerships and summits external actors maintain with African states, and how closely those states align with major powers in UN General Assembly voting.

 

Embassies

Lorem, ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Nemo voluptatibus, quos vel, excepturi ut dolores fugiat eos fugit consequatur magnam quo blanditiis quaerat quibusdam id quia dolorem culpa aliquam inventore.

 

China has embassies in all 53 countries with which it has diplomatic relations.

 

EU Delegations are present in 50 countries and US embassies in 49.

 

Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal and Tunisia stand out as crowded diplomatic arenas, with 15 of these external actors maintaining an embassy in each country.

 

High-level visits

Beyond the presence of diplomatic missions, frequent high-level visits also reflect the nature of relations between countries. High-level visits are strongly concentrated in North Africa, which accounted for 45.7% of all visits.

 

The EU was the most active actor, with 75 visits across 25 African countries. Its leading destinations included Egypt (15 visits), Ethiopia (7), and Kenya, Rwanda and South Africa (5 each).

 

Türkiye recorded 54 visits across 24 countries, but half were to North Africa – particularly Egypt (13), Algeria (7) and Libya (5) – while another 15 were to West Africa.

 

China made 43 visits across 29 countries, giving it the widest and most geographically balanced coverage: 11 visits were to Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean, 10 each to West and East Africa, seven to North Africa and five to Central Africa.

 

India, Japan and South Korea showed a stronger focus on Southern Africa, directing 13 of 27, 12 of 30 and four of 10 visits respectively to Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean, especially South Africa and Mauritius.

 

Partnership hierarchy

Stronger bilateral relations are also reflected in how external actors describe their partnerships with regional actors.

 

China stands out for the breadth of its formalised partnerships, although these vary in depth.

 

Other actors formalise partnerships more selectively: the EU has 11, the US and the UAE seven each, India five, and Russia and Türkiye four each. Egypt, South Africa, Morocco, Nigeria and the DRC have the highest concentration of partnerships.

 

Summit diplomacy

Summit diplomacy around Africa is becoming increasingly crowded.

 

Established frameworks with the EU, China and Japan have proved relatively reliable and recurrent.

 

Newer initiatives by Russia, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and South Korea have been more intermittent.

 

Iran has focused mainly on economic diplomacy since 2023, while Israel’s proposed Africa summit in 2017 was postponed and never held.

 

UN voting patterns

The intensity and depth of diplomatic relations are also often reflected in voting patterns at the UN General Assembly. Abstention is by far the predominant position among African states, reflecting a general tendency towards non-alignment.

 

However, African states align more frequently with the EU than with Russia on Ukraine. Countries aligning with the EU more than 50% of the time include Liberia, Cabo Verde, Seychelles, Malawi, Sierra Leone and Comoros. Those aligning more frequently with Russia include Eritrea, Sudan, Burundi, Zimbabwe and Mali.

 

On UN decolonisation resolutions, African voting patterns align most closely with those of China, India and Türkiye, with Russia forming a somewhat less consistent second tier.

 

Africa’s demand for reform of international financial governance revealed a divide when the agenda shifted to international taxation in 2023. African states, China, India and Russia generally support a stronger UN role, while the EU, Japan and South Korea have moved from opposition towards abstention.

 

text missing?

 

The distance between African and Western or Western-aligned actors is highly topic-dependent: the EU, Japan and South Korea broadly share African positions on Palestinian self-determination but diverge sharply on institutional implementation, while the United States remains consistently opposed to the predominant African voting position.

 

Türkiye and the UAE maintain consistently cautious positions. The United States and Israel remain consistently opposed to tax-related resolutions.

 

Conclusion

Diplomatic engagement with Africa is dense but uneven: China leads on sheer embassy coverage and visit breadth, the EU remains the most active single source of high-level visits, and formal partnerships and summits are proliferating fastest among China, the EU and a widening circle of Gulf and Asian actors. At the UN, abstention still defines the African position more than alignment with any one power, though voting patterns tilt toward the EU on Ukraine and toward China, India and Türkiye on decolonisation and tax governance.